Many therapists avoid AI note-takers over privacy. Dictating a recap — describing the session instead of recording it — addresses the concerns I hear most.

Most of my conversations with therapists at the CAMFT conference this spring landed in the same place. Someone would tell me why they hadn’t tried one of the new AI note-takers.
The objection was almost always about privacy. These were careful therapists being cautious with client privacy and the therapeutic relationship.
One therapist put it simply:
“The relationship with my clients is the most effective tool I have. I wouldn’t risk changing it in any way.”
I think about those conversations a lot, because they’re a clear sign many therapists are curious to explore modern note-takers, but also hold reservations.
There’s an answer to many of the reservations therapists hold, but which doesn’t get talked about much: describing the session instead of recording it. I like to call this dictating a recap.
That one small difference (dictating a recap instead of recording the session) addresses many of the underlying concerns about this new generation of therapy note-takers that use AI.
Let’s look at how dictating a recap, instead of recording a session, changes the conversations I had at CAMFT.
This is where dictating a recap does something I think is genuinely underrated.
When you dictate, you’re the one talking, which means you decide what to say and what to leave out.
Many details of a therapy session you omit from a session note on purpose — the stray comment, the thing that isn’t clinically relevant, the specifics of the most sensitive moment in the hour.
What you don’t say never enters the system at all. Not deleted later, not anonymized. Never there in the first place.
This came up more than any other. When dictating a recap there’s no recording of your client, so there’s nothing new for them to sign.
You’re describing the session afterward through your own lens, the same way you’ve always written your own notes. The conversation you were uncomfortable about doesn’t need to happen when you remove recording.
Therapists said versions of this constantly. “It feels weird to have something recording in the room.” “I don’t think my clients would open up the same way if they knew they were being recorded.”
If you think something in the room might change how your client speaks, how they relate to you, don’t let it in.
Dictating a recap happens after the session, so there’s nothing to bring in. No device on the table, nothing new in the room to potentially interfere. The session stays exactly as it was.
Dictating a recap lets you handle this right at the source. You’re the one deciding what’s specific enough to share with the note-taker and what isn’t.
After so many years of practice and training, a therapist’s mind filters out identifying details intuitively. Dictating a recap keeps that judgement with you.
Everything we’ve talked about so far is what never reaches a note-taker when you dictate a recap. Here’s what happens to the information you do share with Nesso Notes:
None of this is an argument for one right way to work. It’s an alternative path for therapists who want to explore these new note-taker tools but hold reservations.
If you’ve held back because of how you feel about recording your sessions, I hope this helps you assess whether dictating a recap is an option worth exploring for you.
Nesso Notes creates fast, compliant notes from either a session recording or a dictated recap. If you’d like to try it, start a free trial.